Given an adjunction , the canonical presentation of an object is the fork
(this is indeed a fork, by the naturality of ).
In general, this fork need not be a coequalizer, but if is monadic, then we do get a coequalizer. To see this, note that the above pair is -split: When applying to the fork, we get the split coequalizer
for the monad corresponding to the given adjunction and for the -algebra? . Hence, by the monadicity theorem, (in particular) reflects coequalizers for our pair.
The two parallel arrows and appearing in the canonical presentation have a common
section, namely, (by the triangle identities). Hence,
whenever is monadic, the resulting coequalizer is a reflexive coequalizer.
If , and is the forgetful functor, then for a group , is just the free group on the elements of , and is the projection, taking a ‘’formal product’‘ of elements of to the actual product in (since by a triangle identity we have where and the reduced word with one letter ).
Since the coequalizer of in is the familiar quotient by the normal subgroup generated by elements like , the canonical presentation (a coequalizer in this case) is indeed a presentation of in terms of generators and relations.
Categories Work, p. 153.
John Baez, ‘’Universal algebra and diagrammatic reasoning,’‘ slides available online
Last revised on February 20, 2012 at 21:51:03. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.